One should oppose the fascination with Hitler according to which Hitler was, of course, a bad guy, responsible for the death of millions - but he definitely had balls, he pursued with iron will what he wanted. ... This point is not only ethically repulsive, but simply wrong: no, Hitler did not ‘have the balls' to really change things; he did not really act, all his actions were fundamentally reactions, i. e., he acted so that nothing would really change, he stages a big spectacle of Revolution so that the capitalist order could survive.”
In this precise sense of violence, Gandhi was more violent than Hitler: Gandhi's movement effectively endeavored to interrupt the basic functioning of the British colonial state. (Slavoj Žižek)

One should oppose the fascination with Hitler according to which Hitler was, of course, a bad guy, responsible for the death of millions - but he definitely had balls, he pursued with iron will what he wanted. ... This point is not only ethically repulsive, but simply wrong: no, Hitler did not ‘have the balls' to really change things; he did not really act, all his actions were fundamentally reactions, i. e., he acted so that nothing would really change, he stages a big spectacle of Revolution so that the capitalist order could survive.” In this precise sense of violence, Gandhi was more violent than Hitler: Gandhi's movement effectively endeavored to interrupt the basic functioning of the British colonial state.

Slavoj Žižek

Related topics

act bad basic big british capitalist change colonial course death fascination guy interrupt iron movement nothing oppose order point pursued responsible revolution sense should spectacle state violence violent wrong hitler things gandhi functioning balls

Related quotes