The term ‘kinship' correctly suggests the existence not only of contemporary relatives but also of ancestors. Indeed, the recent discussion of dynamic capability was prefigured historically, with a variety of terminology, in a number of sources. Perhaps the most directly relevant example among these earlier contributions is Schumpeter's discussion of the ‘routinization of innovation' (Schumpeter 1950). Schumpeter's argument presented, however, an issue that remains central in contemporary discussion of dynamic capability-the possibly problematic character of the claim that there is such a thing as ‘learned competence' for doingnew things. (Sidney G. Winter)

The term ‘kinship' correctly suggests the existence not only of contemporary relatives but also of ancestors. Indeed, the recent discussion of dynamic capability was prefigured historically, with a variety of terminology, in a number of sources. Perhaps the most directly relevant example among these earlier contributions is Schumpeter's discussion of the ‘routinization of innovation' (Schumpeter 1950). Schumpeter's argument presented, however, an issue that remains central in contemporary discussion of dynamic capability-the possibly problematic character of the claim that there is such a thing as ‘learned competence' for doingnew things.

Sidney G. Winter

Related topics

argument capability central character claim competence contemporary discussion dynamic early example existence innovation issue kinship number perhaps problematic recent term terminology thing variety remains schumpeter things routinization

Related quotes