Quotesdtb.com
Home
Authors
Quotes of the day
Top quotes
Topics
John Byrne quotes
There had been fan clubs before. The Merry Marvel Marching Society shamelessly stole its name from the Mary Marvel Marching Society. I was, myself, a member of the Supermen of America. What was key to these, tho, was that the fans who belonged were not truly interconnected. There was a sense of being part of a greater whole, but the hobby itself remained largely solitary. Which, the history of the industry seems to teach, was a good thing. (2007)
John Byrne
This guy should have been taken out of the croc pen, had his kids taken from him, and been thrown in the deepest, darkest, dankest pit the Australian judicial system has to offer. Preferably after being skinned alive. Asshole is too good a word. (2006)
John Byrne
Getting older is fine. There is nothing you can do to stop it so you might as well stay on the bus.
John Byrne
I feel not unlike a small boy, waking from a bad dream to find reality not much of an improvement.
John Byrne
I think my work has become more interesting, well to me anyway.
John Byrne
I have no interest in anybody's life that way so it defeats me why people go to that length to pry.
John Byrne
Online fundraising is so important to the Democratic Party.
John Byrne
As I have said many times, I don't care if they wipe away every trace of every book I have ever worked on. I just wish they'd stop doing so by pressing the "rewind” button. That's just creative bankruptcy.
John Byrne
Okay, time for me to rain on this parade. I didn't know he had kids. Young kids. This alters the mix considerably. This makes him an asshole. Cops and firemen, to name but two, place their lives on the line every day to protect others. There was nothing Steve Irwin was doing that he could not have done-as did, say, David Attenborough-without putting his life at risk. This takes this from tragedy to stupidity, and, worse, irresponsibility.
John Byrne
To think that the internet allowing fans to feel that they are "not alone as readers” plays to the "clubhouse” mentality that is a large part of what's wrong with comics today. When you have isolated fans, reading the books on their own and not knowing (or much caring) if anybody else is, then the prime reason for reading is enjoyment-it's all about the books themselves. It's not about "getting together” with fellow fans to dissect and deconstruct...
John Byrne
No. Sorry, but no. I fully appreciate how much "trouble” I will get into for this, but no. I cannot let this pass without comment. Using the only hours past death of your own mother to make a point about a comic book story? There are not sufficient words in the English language to properly express my disgust.
John Byrne
I am glad this asshole is dead. Sorry for his wife and kids, but relieved they are in no further danger from his lunacy!
John Byrne
If you had paid any attention, instead of just scanning for places you can display your sparkling wit, you might have noticed that I use this forum in much the same way firemen use fire to fight fire. But, since you ask, I can shut it down for you.
John Byrne
Any opinion-even an informed opinion-expressed from behind the shelter of a screen name is rendered automatically invalid, as far as I'm concerned. Courage of one's convictions is one of the few things that make people worth the powder to blow 'em up. And, after all, no one would be getting up in arms if I was posting as FuzyBuny and not letting anybody know who I really was. Internet cowards are among the lowest of the species. Grow some f***ing balls, you losers!
John Byrne
As I have noted elsewhere, and with the clarity of hindsight, I think Stan and Jack made a mistake when they decided to make Thor the "real” Thor. "Whosoever holds his hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor(r)!” That was really all I needed to know. But, of course, the rest of the Norse mythology began appearing early on, so it was only natural (if a tad anal) that fans should start writing in wondering what had happened to the real Thor. (2007)
John Byrne
...were I in charge of either of the Big Two, my "solution” to the ills of the industry would be to "reset” all the books to where they were at some arbitrarily chosen point in time. Usually I say 1976, for many reasons good and bad. Mostly because that's the last year when, while actually still working in the Biz, I really still felt like a fan. (2007)
John Byrne
To harken back to the pre-Crisis days is to play to exactly what I find most wrong with DC these days-their idea of "innovation” is to press "rewind”. And that is most definitely catering to the "old” crowd. (2007)
John Byrne
If ^^***** had the stones they'd say "Screw continuity! As of January 2007, we're hitting ‘rewind' and resetting all the books to where they were in 1972-just set in modern time.” No "cosmic events,” no 100 issue crossovers. Just an editorial fiat, like Man of Steel. Only way to get things done. (2006)
John Byrne
Usually, I am quick to point out how the internet would have had a profoundly negative effect-as it does today-if it had been in place twenty, thirty, forty years ago. How things like the DC rebirth in the 1950s would have most certainly died aborning had internet chat rooms and forums been around, where a small group of vocal fans could make themselves seem like an army screaming against this utter abandonment of cherished "continuity.” (2007)
John Byrne
Androids (i.e., artificial humans) tend to blur the line between living and non-living. Especially in a case like the Human Torch, where his origin tends to establish him as something much more than a clever assemblage of non-organic parts. The "instability” which originally caused him to burst into flame spontaneously indicates there's an unknown factor involved. Push come to shove, I would put Jim Hammond into his own category, and grant that, altho he is "not of woman born,” he is, in a true sense, alive. In other words, not a toaster. (2006)
John Byrne
The question becomes, I suppose, one of value. Knowing that the Vision's complete personality/memory/intelligence was downloaded into a computer in Titan (was it Titan? Memory blurs) allowed me to scrape his brain in my VisionQuest story, since everything could be restored with a literal flip of a switch. Should something that can be so easily copied and retrieved be treated as having the same intrinsic value as a human being? Should any of the human Avengers, for instance, ever risk their lives on behalf of the Vision? My vote would be no (as some of you have probably already guessed)-but I would say that even if it were not possible to restore or "save” the Vision in any other way. He is a "toaster.” (2006)
John Byrne
Imagine, 24 pages of superhero adventures produced by the same writer and artist every month!! How did they do it? (What? By being professional about it? But that's too much like work!)
John Byrne
Previous
1
(Current)
2
Next